|
|
Post by profdunebastard on Feb 27, 2004 11:31:05 GMT -5
Again, I see you totally ignored by links to Talk Originds.
Oh and your ad hominem attacks were more on the other, original board, which is gone now. Your first post said something like-you aren't freethinkers, even though I didn't read your message statement. But that's okay, I don't hold it against you. Feel fee to keep coming to poke the hornet's nest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Valvilis on Feb 27, 2004 15:24:16 GMT -5
Maggie, no need to apologize, it's who you are. And the way I write to you is how I treat people like you. The less we couch this in pretense, the more raw and useful the dialouge will become. Likewise, the more you pretend to be something you aren't (your dandy apologetic reformed-bigot guise) the less we can get done here. I'd rather see you go back to the way you used to be before you strated trying to garner sympathy and earn respect for acting like a better person.
As far as that crap math you posted, let us be the judge of the citations. Give us the link. You know when you're on a illegitimate webpage. If you have to scour before you find the one page that doesn't disagree with you, you're probably wrong. If you have to include the word "ministries" in your search string, don't expect to find good science. Is all of this really that hard to get?
Oh yeah, and you never did get around to actually addressing Occam's Razor, you just trailed off into some poorly thought out intelligent design based straw-manning of abiogenesis.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnonymousUser on Feb 28, 2004 1:33:29 GMT -5
the only assumption that i made was that of the number of lifeforms possible, and that is just as bad as you making the assumption that only one form of life is possible. you also first assumed you initial number, which was clearly flawed because you considered many factors multiple times. All my assumptions were all within reason, or at least as much reason as was in the initial arguement. so if you want to attack the basis for my arguement, you are just attacking yours, which is where i got most of my numbers from.
i'd also like to see where you got your numbers from, posting numbers and saying their source is credible without posting it isnt very convincing. I could always say that there is evidence of anti-gravity without posting what actually backs up that claim.
|
|
Dafizman
Friendly Neighborhood Heretic
because nothing says free thinking like parakeets
Posts: 73
|
Post by Dafizman on Feb 28, 2004 12:22:42 GMT -5
Serioulsy Mag-dude, before you start claiming there is or isn't evidence for something, you should sorta ask someone who knows more about these things than you do. Take for instance your assumption that there is no evidence for multi-dimensions. I gotta go do some stuff, but I'll elaborate later. I guerentee you I've been exposed to some really funky stuff that you've never seen before.
Dan "The Fisikist" Olds
|
|
