fetus gets legal staus

[Seany-D]

why would one pass such legislation other than to pave the way to overturn abortion rulings? If a bloke kills one person vs. two, what's the difference, in the law's eyes, with the possible exception of time served?

www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/26/unborn.victims.ap/index.html

Sean "can we charge a doctor with 40 million counts of homocide for a vasectomy?" Davis

[Valvilis]

It is simply a foot in the door bill. Like many similar such nonsense bills, the intention is simply to have something to refer back to the next time Roe vs Wade gets a supreme revisit. "Oh, but according to the UVOV act, a fetus does have intrinisic human rights." Someof the backers have come out and admitted as much. You're talking about the same people who continually cut funding to poor single mothers, child care, health care for poor families, etc. Clearly the intent has nothing to do with the best interest of the unborn children, but in simply that their (incidently incorrect) interpritation of biblical law is upheld in US courts.