|
Post by phoenixsong44 on Sept 21, 2004 20:14:03 GMT -5
"Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests. "-George Washinton's farewell address
I find that this is highly applicable to the political situation going on today. It seems to me that we are so focused on the Iraq situation that we are ignoring much of what needs to be tended to in our own society. Bush has acheived 'applause and confidence of the people', and his opposers are frowned upon, and considered unpatriotic for decrying Bush's actions. Another thing that strikes me as incredibly ridiculous is the threat hinted at by Bush supporters--that Al Quaida supports Kerry. This is incredibly dirty politics, and has certainly crossed the moral line.
When a reporter asked [house speaker]Hastert if he thought al Qaeda would operate with more comfort if Kerry were elected, the speaker said, "That's my opinion, yes."
This is just another way to stir up an emotional reaction, to strike fear into people so they will vote for Bush. This truly disgusts me.
|
|
|
Post by Seany-D on Sept 22, 2004 8:33:49 GMT -5
Last year, at my hyper-fun "State of the Union Party at Sean's Place", Roger took it upon himself to count the number of times that the word "terror" was used during the speech. It was ridiculous, something like 130 times in the hour-long speech. Fear-mongering is quite popular in the current administration, because people who are afraid will gladly give up rational discourse and liberty for a feeling of security. It's fear of the unknown -- portrayed as "unknown evil" by our black-and-white, evangelical president -- that is causing people to say conclude that we need to not "switch the course of leadership" during this war (in Iraq, not on terror. You can't fight a war against terror anymore than you can fight a war against capitalism), even though we obviously have been led capriciously and stubbornly, two qualities that I would not prefer to have in someone who commands the world's strongest army.
Oh, and I'll throw in a quote for good measure: "They that can give away essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --B. Franklin
|
|
|
Post by AnonymousUser on Sept 22, 2004 12:28:25 GMT -5
yea, had anyone been playing the SOTU drinking game would have died....
|
|